<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could This Be News? Employee Fired Because She Was Too Old And Too Expensive Has Right To Age Discrimination Trial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2010/03/17/could-this-be-news-employee-fired-because-she-was-too-old-and-too-expensive-has-right-to-age-discrimination-trial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2010/03/17/could-this-be-news-employee-fired-because-she-was-too-old-and-too-expensive-has-right-to-age-discrimination-trial/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:46:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brian Beecher</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2010/03/17/could-this-be-news-employee-fired-because-she-was-too-old-and-too-expensive-has-right-to-age-discrimination-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-70558</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Beecher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=3109#comment-70558</guid>
		<description>This is obviously a blatant case of age discrimination.  I have never been told exactly that, but as far back as twenty years ago I was accused of complacency on a job where up until then I had received substantially good reviews.  And this was in a non-medical department of a hospital.  It was the mid-80&#039;s which was the time when the DRG&#039;s forced a lot of restructuring.  Eventually I was one of 60 or so who was laid off, but as I was under so much stress because things were so different, I was actually quite relieved when it happened.  One thing I feel that this organization should do is convince states and the federal government as well to move away from a strict at-will concept to a just cause one.  This way those who feel their firings were not just who don&#039;t have representation would have a voice.  And I believe it would also reduce the need for unions.  Let&#039;s start moving on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is obviously a blatant case of age discrimination.  I have never been told exactly that, but as far back as twenty years ago I was accused of complacency on a job where up until then I had received substantially good reviews.  And this was in a non-medical department of a hospital.  It was the mid-80&#8217;s which was the time when the DRG&#8217;s forced a lot of restructuring.  Eventually I was one of 60 or so who was laid off, but as I was under so much stress because things were so different, I was actually quite relieved when it happened.  One thing I feel that this organization should do is convince states and the federal government as well to move away from a strict at-will concept to a just cause one.  This way those who feel their firings were not just who don&#8217;t have representation would have a voice.  And I believe it would also reduce the need for unions.  Let&#8217;s start moving on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Fanning</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2010/03/17/could-this-be-news-employee-fired-because-she-was-too-old-and-too-expensive-has-right-to-age-discrimination-trial/comment-page-1/#comment-70537</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Fanning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 20:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=3109#comment-70537</guid>
		<description>Interesting how the Gross decision was used to defeat summary judgment.  Maybe the decision is not so horrible after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting how the Gross decision was used to defeat summary judgment.  Maybe the decision is not so horrible after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

