<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Young Workers: Hit Hard, Hitting Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/12/16/young-workers-hit-hard-hitting-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/12/16/young-workers-hit-hard-hitting-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:46:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 50+ Employee</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/12/16/young-workers-hit-hard-hitting-back/comment-page-1/#comment-48500</link>
		<dc:creator>50+ Employee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=2752#comment-48500</guid>
		<description>Ageism is going to limit the amount of coaching and knowledge sharing that older workers are willing to work with younger workers.

I have been at my employment for 24  years, and have been worried about my job for 7 years--REALLY worried.  My employer does not approve any learning opportunities for me even though they budget 10% of my salary for such purposes.  All training funds go to training younger workers.

The yearly merit raises are pooled to be 2.2% for all employees.  Yet if you are at 110% (10% over the mid point of your range) you receive fewer than 2.2% to increase the raises of younger staff.  That&#039;s how they are trying to attract and retain younger staff. 

So, I would say that younger workers are in a far better position that &gt; 50&#039;s who are losing their jobs daily (early retirement) just at the time when they are trying to put away $$ for retirement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ageism is going to limit the amount of coaching and knowledge sharing that older workers are willing to work with younger workers.</p>
<p>I have been at my employment for 24  years, and have been worried about my job for 7 years&#8211;REALLY worried.  My employer does not approve any learning opportunities for me even though they budget 10% of my salary for such purposes.  All training funds go to training younger workers.</p>
<p>The yearly merit raises are pooled to be 2.2% for all employees.  Yet if you are at 110% (10% over the mid point of your range) you receive fewer than 2.2% to increase the raises of younger staff.  That&#8217;s how they are trying to attract and retain younger staff. </p>
<p>So, I would say that younger workers are in a far better position that &gt; 50&#8217;s who are losing their jobs daily (early retirement) just at the time when they are trying to put away $$ for retirement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diane</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/12/16/young-workers-hit-hard-hitting-back/comment-page-1/#comment-47917</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 19:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=2752#comment-47917</guid>
		<description>People over 50 are also targeted due to ageism for job losses and just about impossible to get another job as gen x&#039;s management aren&#039;t to keen on hiring someone old enough to be their parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People over 50 are also targeted due to ageism for job losses and just about impossible to get another job as gen x&#8217;s management aren&#8217;t to keen on hiring someone old enough to be their parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

