Young Workers: Hit Hard, Hitting Back
December 16th, 2009 | Liz Shuler
As newly elected secretary-treasurer of the AFL-CIO, I traveled the country this fall, talking with workers and hearing their concerns. The economic crisis is causing a lot of pain. So many people have no jobs, no health care–and many are losing their homes. And as I looked into the faces of young workers, the reality hit home that these young people are part of the first generation in recent history likely to be worse off than their parents.
This is a tragedy.
The AFL-CIO and our community affiliate, Working America, recently surveyed young workers–and I’m not talking about 17- and 18-year-olds. I’m talking about 18- to 34-year-olds. In the past 10 years, young workers have suffered disproportionately from the downturn in the economy:
- One in three young workers is worried about being able to find a job–let alone a full-time job with benefits.
- Only 31 percent make enough money to cover their bills and put some aside–that is 22 percentage points worse than it was 10 years ago.
- Nearly half worry about having more debt than they can handle.
- One in three still lives at home with parents.
Young workers are living the effects of a 30-year campaign to create a low-wage workforce. It has succeeded.
For decades, the far right led an anti-government, anti-investment, feed-the-rich-and-starve-the-poor drive that gave us an era of deregulation, privatization and job exporting.
At the same time, corporations and government attacked unions and workers’ freedom to form unions and bargain for decent wages and benefits. When unions are strong, paychecks grow and workers have benefits like health care and pensions.
When unions are under attack, paychecks shrink. Pensions vanish. Health care becomes the emergency room.
What’s left is not working for young people–or for any of us. It will take a broadly shared sense of wartime urgency to replace today’s low-wage economy with a high-wage, high-skills economy. The first step must be immediate action to address the nation’s jobs crisis, with five essential steps:
- Extend the lifeline for jobless workers.
- Rebuild America’s schools, roads and energy systems and invest in green technology and green jobs.
- Increase aid to state and local governments to maintain vital services.
- Fund jobs in our communities.
- Put TARP funds to work for Main Street with job-creating loans to small businesses.
We took these initiatives to the White House Summit on Jobs on Dec. 3 and are pushing Congress to take action now. The first reports from the Jobs Summit are encouraging, and we look forward to working with the Obama administration and Congress to carry on this momentum.
It’s time to rebuild an economy that works–an economy based on prosperity, an economy we can be proud to pass on to our children and their children. And we need young people to lead the way. That survey I mentioned earlier shows they are ready.
· Young workers have a whole new level of civic engagement, with the surge of new voters in the 2008 election.
· They are well-informed and following government and policy news.
· They believe in collective action and understand the power of having a union.
· They have hope for the future and the vision of a savvy, diverse movement to bring about progressive change.
We’re planning a major summit for young workers after the first of the year to bring all our ideas and voices together. When crises hit, it’s young people who drive change.
Martin Luther King Jr. was 26 when he led the Montgomery bus boycott. At 25, César Chávez was registering Mexican Americans to vote. Walter Reuther headed strikes demanding GM recognize its workers’ rights starting when he was 30. Elizabeth Cady Stanton was 33 when she drafted the declaration of women’s rights.
Young people are being hard in this jobs crisis. But I believe they provide much of the fuel we need to get out of it.
*This article originally appeared in The Huffington Post on December 7, 2009. Reprinted with permission by the author.
**Photo credt: © 2009 Jay Mallin. All rights reserved. Licensed soley for use in publications, both electronic and print, websites, and public relations of the AFL-CIO. All other uses, publication, or distribution strictly prohibited. Licensing is contingent on payment in full of our invoice. For more information, contact: jay@JayMallinPhotos.com 202-363-2756
About the Author: Liz Shuler was elected AFL-CIO Secretary-Treasurer in September 2009, the youngest person ever to become an officer of the AFL-CIO. Shuler previously was the highest-ranking women in the Electrical Workers (IBEW) union, serving as the top assistant to the IBEW president since 2004. In 1993, she joined IBEW Local 125 in Portland, Ore., where she worked as an organizer and state legislative and political director. In
1998, she was part of the IBEW’s international staff in Washington, D.C., as a legislative and political representative.
Related Posts:
Tags: AFL-CIO, Green jobs, health care, Jobs, Liz Shuler, TARP, unemployment, young workers
December 16th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
People over 50 are also targeted due to ageism for job losses and just about impossible to get another job as gen x’s management aren’t to keen on hiring someone old enough to be their parents.
December 19th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Ageism is going to limit the amount of coaching and knowledge sharing that older workers are willing to work with younger workers.
I have been at my employment for 24 years, and have been worried about my job for 7 years–REALLY worried. My employer does not approve any learning opportunities for me even though they budget 10% of my salary for such purposes. All training funds go to training younger workers.
The yearly merit raises are pooled to be 2.2% for all employees. Yet if you are at 110% (10% over the mid point of your range) you receive fewer than 2.2% to increase the raises of younger staff. That’s how they are trying to attract and retain younger staff.
So, I would say that younger workers are in a far better position that > 50’s who are losing their jobs daily (early retirement) just at the time when they are trying to put away $$ for retirement.