http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/06/26/new-supreme-court-age-discrimination-decision-will-be-gone-in-a-flash/ Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:46:42 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/06/26/new-supreme-court-age-discrimination-decision-will-be-gone-in-a-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-92359 Texas Lawyer Tue, 22 Jun 2010 16:23:32 +0000 http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=1671#comment-92359 Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggens, I didn't see that either in this case. It leaves a little bit too much undictated to make me confortable with this case. Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggens, I didn’t see that either in this case. It leaves a little bit too much undictated to make me confortable with this case.

]]> http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2009/06/26/new-supreme-court-age-discrimination-decision-will-be-gone-in-a-flash/comment-page-1/#comment-83300 Richard A Peterson Sun, 09 May 2010 11:57:39 +0000 http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=1671#comment-83300 I can not find this in the that relies on a previous Supreme Court case, Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggens, The language says that “an age discrimination plaintiff can win if it proves that the discrimination played a (not the) role in the employer’s decision making process and had a (not the) determinative influence on the outcome.” where is it?? I can not find this in the that relies on a previous Supreme Court case, Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggens, The language says that “an age discrimination plaintiff can win if it proves that the discrimination played a (not the) role in the employer’s decision making process and had a (not the) determinative influence on the outcome.” where is it??

]]>