<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Starbucks Brews Challenge for Labor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/29/starbucks-brews-challenge-for-labor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/29/starbucks-brews-challenge-for-labor/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 19:38:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/29/starbucks-brews-challenge-for-labor/comment-page-1/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=930#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>I was fired for discussing unionization at Starbucks. I&#039;m glad to see that labor liberals are beginning to acknowledge that workers at Starbucks have not only a right, but a need, to organize for their own independent voice on the job. Although it is useful to isolate, even villify, an enemy (such as Wal-Mart) and polarize society against them, this kind of tactic eventually weakens the labor movement by making some workers think that they don&#039;t &#039;need&#039; a union. Corporations couldn&#039;t be happier with the result.

Also, what is this Andy Stern quote supposed to mean? He has come out AGAINST workers at Starbucks organizing in the past, claiming that Starbucks is a &#039;good&#039; corporation. So now that the capitalist economy is taking a tumble, is SEIU or UNITE-HERE, or for that matter, Working America going to come to the rescue of me and my low-wage fellow retail workers? I doubt it. So we organize our own union with the IWW and get put down by the likes Stern and Fellner, people who make 5-20 times as much as we do to write books and make grand statements about the future of the labor movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was fired for discussing unionization at Starbucks. I&#8217;m glad to see that labor liberals are beginning to acknowledge that workers at Starbucks have not only a right, but a need, to organize for their own independent voice on the job. Although it is useful to isolate, even villify, an enemy (such as Wal-Mart) and polarize society against them, this kind of tactic eventually weakens the labor movement by making some workers think that they don&#8217;t &#8216;need&#8217; a union. Corporations couldn&#8217;t be happier with the result.</p>
<p>Also, what is this Andy Stern quote supposed to mean? He has come out AGAINST workers at Starbucks organizing in the past, claiming that Starbucks is a &#8216;good&#8217; corporation. So now that the capitalist economy is taking a tumble, is SEIU or UNITE-HERE, or for that matter, Working America going to come to the rescue of me and my low-wage fellow retail workers? I doubt it. So we organize our own union with the IWW and get put down by the likes Stern and Fellner, people who make 5-20 times as much as we do to write books and make grand statements about the future of the labor movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
