<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Return of the Public</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/25/return-of-the-public/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/25/return-of-the-public/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 04:46:42 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/25/return-of-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-632</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 21:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=890#comment-632</guid>
		<description>I feel as if I agree, but I&#039;m not sure if your post is a statement of hope rather than analysis. Defenders of the market have gone quiet, but still believe the market will pull us through (and some will fall by the wayside - see the number of references to &#039;survival of the fittest&#039; online).
So to the &#039;why&#039;. Why didn&#039;t the market work? (I posed a simplistic version of the question on my blog - http://pleasewalkonthegrass.blogspot.com/2008/10/you-never-know-i-studied-economics-once.html).
What is it about market-focused companies (even those with social objectives) that means they can&#039;t or won&#039;t get sufficient traction to achieve common goods such as sustainability?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel as if I agree, but I&#8217;m not sure if your post is a statement of hope rather than analysis. Defenders of the market have gone quiet, but still believe the market will pull us through (and some will fall by the wayside &#8211; see the number of references to &#8217;survival of the fittest&#8217; online).<br />
So to the &#8216;why&#8217;. Why didn&#8217;t the market work? (I posed a simplistic version of the question on my blog &#8211; <a href="http://pleasewalkonthegrass.blogspot.com/2008/10/you-never-know-i-studied-economics-once.html)" rel="nofollow">http://pleasewalkonthegrass.blogspot.com/2008/10/you-never-know-i-studied-economics-once.html)</a>.<br />
What is it about market-focused companies (even those with social objectives) that means they can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t get sufficient traction to achieve common goods such as sustainability?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Freeman on what the credit crunch means &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/25/return-of-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Freeman on what the credit crunch means &#124; ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 20:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=890#comment-469</guid>
		<description>[...] friend&#8217; interest in the trade union movement. I&#8217;ve only just spotted this post from a few days ago from the US blog Today&#8217;s Workplace. Its conclusions will not surprise, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] friend&#8217; interest in the trade union movement. I&#8217;ve only just spotted this post from a few days ago from the US blog Today&#8217;s Workplace. Its conclusions will not surprise, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gloria</title>
		<link>http://www.todaysworkplace.org/2008/09/25/return-of-the-public/comment-page-1/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 20:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.todaysworkplace.org/?p=890#comment-342</guid>
		<description>I completely agree. The values of capitalism purists have been disproportionately amplified by mainstream media, and don&#039;t reflect those of everyday people. But with citizen journalism and the Internet, the values we hold as a nation will be much more diverse and open to ongoing discussion and reflection about what would be best for our society as a whole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree. The values of capitalism purists have been disproportionately amplified by mainstream media, and don&#8217;t reflect those of everyday people. But with citizen journalism and the Internet, the values we hold as a nation will be much more diverse and open to ongoing discussion and reflection about what would be best for our society as a whole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

